The alleged conflict presupposes that resources must be the sole equalisandum, but this premise is precisely what the luck-egalitarian literature contests, meaning the incompatibility is an artifact of an unnecessarily restrictive framework rather than a deep logical truth.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Equalisandum(as used in theories of justice and fairness): The thing that a theory of fairness says should be distributed equally among people. It's Latin-based jargon for 'what should be made equal.'
Premise: A premise is a statement or fact that you assume to be true as a starting point for reasoning or making an argument. Think of it as the foundation or building block you use to reach a conclusion—for example, "All dogs are animals" and "My pet is a dog" are premises that lead to the conclusion "My pet is an animal." Premises are essentially the evidence or claims you offer before drawing a final conclusion.
Restrictive framework(as used in philosophical methodology): A way of thinking about a problem that limits your options or assumptions too much, making it seem harder than it actually is.
artifact(Contrasted with real cellular structures in evaluating microscopy results): A feature in a micrograph produced by the methods of preparation rather than by actual structures in the cell

Based on where you are in your exploration