Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The approaches of Robinson and Nelson provide a fully rig... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Adopting the epsilon-delta formalization of limits is not necessary for a fully rigorous development of real analysis.

    The approaches of Robinson and Nelson provide a fully rigorous development of real analysis.

    All sources support itTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & KnowledgeAll sources support it

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Adopting the epsilon-delta formalization of limits is not necessary for a fully ...The approaches of Robinson and Nelson do not rely on the epsilon-delta formaliza...

    Similar

    The approaches pioneered by Robinson and Nelson yield proofs of theore...86%Non-standard real analysis can prove results in real analysis that wer...78%Rational analysis provides a clear, sober method grounded in direct ap...77%Non-standard analysis provides simpler and more intuitive proofs of ma...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: infinity
    View source passageHide passage
    The approaches pioneered by Robinson and Nelson do not allow us to prove results about the standard real numbers that cannot be proved using standard real analysis. However, these approaches do provide simpler—and, in some sense, more intuitive—proofs of many theorems of standard real analysis. (On the pedagogical benefits of non-standard analysis, see, for example, Keisler (1976)). And there are cases of results in real analysis that were first proven using non-standard real analysis (see, for

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective