Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The argument conflates 'known sub specie aeternitatis' wi... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→If all truths are known sub specie aeternitatis, then the appearance of non-eternal truth reflects epistemic limitation, not ontological contingency.

    The argument conflates 'known sub specie aeternitatis' with determinism; timeless knowledge of contingent truths is philosophically coherent without this move.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    If all truths are known sub specie aeternitatis, then the appearance of non-eter...

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    If all truths are known sub specie aeternitatis, then the appearance of non-eter...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective