Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The argument from premises 1 and 2 to conclusion 3 cannot be rejected on the grounds that the Father and the Son are merely two different modes of God.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The three Persons of the Trinity are three selves, not merely three modes of God.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the Father and the Son are distinct selves rather than modes, then the claim that each is a mode of God cannot be used to block the inference from 1 and 2 to 3.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Modalism, condemned at the Council of Constantinople (381 CE), holds that Father, Son, and Spirit are merely successive masks of one divine person.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Orthodox Trinitarian theology, from the Cappadocian Fathers onward, insists the three hypostases are genuinely distinct, not reducible to modes of appearance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, invoking modal identity to block the logical inference collapses orthodox Trinitarianism into the heresy of Sabellianism, which the tradition explicitly rejects.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Richard Swinburne and other social Trinitarians argue each Person possesses distinct centers of consciousness, will, and intentional action irreducible to modes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If Father and Son have numerically distinct wills and cognitive states, as Swinburne's 'The Christian God' (1994) defends, they cannot be mere modes of a single substrate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.An argument blocked only by denying distinct personhood thus fails on the very metaphysical grounds mainstream analytic Trinitarian theology already accepts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.