Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The argument that hiding biological origins is disrespect... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The argument that hiding biological origins is disrespectful begs the question

    BioethicsPersonal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Deception about biological origins is only a severe form of disrespect if biological ties are important
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Whether biological ties are important is precisely what is at issue in the debate about the right to know one's origins
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsPersonal Identity

    Related

    Deception about biological origins is only a severe form of disrespect if biolog...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Whether biological ties are important is precisely what is at issue in the debat...

    Similar

    Deception about biological origins is only a severe form of disrespect...86%Whether biological ties are important is precisely what is at issue in...79%Children do not have a right to know their biological history on the b...75%Individuals have a right to know facts about their biological history69%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: gametes-donation-sale
    View source passageHide passage
    One strategy is to tie the right to know to the right to an identity. Here the argument is that individuals require genuine facts about their biological history in order to develop a proper personal identity (Ravitsky 2010). However, one response is that while children have a right to an identity, they do not have a right to a particular kind of identity, such as one based primarily on historical biological ties (Allen 1996). Another route is to argue that children have a right to be respected,
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit