Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The assumption that a person who experiences the semantic properties of a stimulus must already have an experience of that stimulus's simple spatial properties is mistaken.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The brain represents the physical properties of stimuli in multiple, parallel, and somewhat overlapping systems.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Only some of these systems put the subject in a position to think about the properties they represent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A brain representation of a word's physical properties (required to access its meaning) need not put the perceiver in a position to form thoughts about those physical properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.