Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The Axiom of Limitation of Size implies the Axiom of Repl... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The Axiom of Limitation of Size implies the Axiom of Replacement

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The Axiom of Limitation of Size states that a class is a set if and only if it is not the same size as the universe
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A class which is the same size as a set cannot be the same size as the universe
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A class which is the same size as a set cannot be the same size as the universe

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The Axiom of Limitation of Size states that a class is a set if and only if it i...

    Similar

    The Axiom of Limitation of Size implies the Axiom of Choice100%The Manual of Reason provides its own definition of yogyatā86%Under the Piece-of-Pie Model, there is a part of the Form of the F in ...84%Therefore, F ≠ G implies the extension of F ≠ the extension of G.77%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: settheory-alternative
    View source passageHide passage
    This elegant axiom is essentially due to von Neumann. A class bijection is a class of ordered pairs; there might be pathology here if we did not have enough pairs as sets, but other axioms do provide for their existence. It is interesting to observe that this axiom implies Replacement (a class which is the same size as a set cannot be the same size as the universe) and, surprisingly, implies Choice (the von Neumann ordinals make up a proper class essentially by the Burali-Forti paradox, so the u
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit