Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The basic norm is presupposed only by those who accept th... — Carmelics
    Home/Social Contract
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Accepting the normative validity of law is not rationally compelled

    The basic norm is presupposed only by those who accept the normative validity of law

    Social Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Social Contract

    Connections

    2 topics

    Skepticism2 linkedRights & Liberty1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Social Contract
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Accepting the normative validity of law is not rationally compelledAnarchism — a rejection of law's normative validity — is a coherent optionOne is not rationally required to adopt the attitude that law has normative vali...

    Similar

    The basic norm must be presupposed rather than derived from a higher l...90%The basic norm must be presupposed rather than derived from positive l...89%A norm is legally valid only if it belongs to a system of norms that i...85%Legal validity of a norm does not require that the norm is actually fo...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: lawphil-theory
    View source passageHide passage
    It would be a mistake, however, to look for an explanation of Kelsen’s argument in the logic of Kant’s transcendental argument. (Kelsen himself seems to have changed his views about this over the years; he may have started with a kind of neo-Kantian perspective one can discern in PT1, and gradually shifted to a Humean version of his main argument, which is quite evident in GT. However, this is a very controversial issue; for a different view, see Paulson 2013 and Green 2016.) Kant employed a tra

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective