Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The 'believes-true S' schema inherits the inscrutability ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Intentionality does not pose insurmountable semantic problems.

    The 'believes-true S' schema inherits the inscrutability of reference problem: Quine's arguments show no fact of the matter determines which sentence S correctly captures the content of a belief state.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Content of a belief state(what determines which sentence correctly captures what someone believes)
    What a belief is actually about—the specific proposition or idea that someone believes to be true.
    Fact of the matter(whether there is a definitive fact determining correct interpretation)
    An objective truth that exists independently—something that is actually the case, rather than a matter of opinion or interpretation.
    Inscrutability of reference(the core problem being inherited by the 'believes-true S' schema)
    Quine's idea that we can never definitively pin down what a word or sentence truly refers to or means, because multiple different interpretations could all fit the same observations.
    Quine(as a proper name referring to the philosopher whose theory is being discussed)
    Willard Van Orman Quine was a 20th-century American philosopher who wrote about how we know things and how language works. In this statement, we're discussing one of his specific ideas about observation.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Reference (philosophical sense)(the problem of determining what our words actually refer to)
    What a word or sentence is actually about or points to in the world; the connection between language and reality.
    Schema (in logic/philosophy)(the 'believes-true S' is a schema where S is a placeholder for any sentence)
    A general template or pattern used to represent something—like a formula with blanks that can be filled in different ways.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Intentionality does not pose insurmountable semantic problems.

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective