Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The Big Bang can be considered an event (or an initial state) about which one may inquire why it existed.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.An 'event' in any coherent causal framework presupposes a temporal context in which prior states obtain and transitions occur.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The Big Bang singularity, as a boundary of spacetime rather than a point within it, lacks the relational structure that makes causal 'why' questions well-formed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Broadening 'event' to include boundary conditions strips the concept of the causal-explanatory content that makes asking 'why it existed' meaningful rather than merely grammatical.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Grünbaum's principle of spontaneous existence holds that the default explanatory posture for any state of affairs is that it simply obtains, absent specific deformation from a prior state.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The supporting argument illicitly transfers ordinary event-causation language to a singular limit case where no prior physical state exists to ground a contrastive explanation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Without a physically meaningful contrast class—states in which the Big Bang does not occur—the question 'why did it exist?' is explanatorily idle, not merely unanswered.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.We can broaden the notion of 'event' by removing the requirement that it must be relational, taking place in a space-time context.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.In the Big Bang the space-time universe commences and then continues to exist in measurable time subsequent to the initiating singularity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.One might consider the Big Bang as either the event of the commencing of the universe or else a state in which any two points in the observable universe were arbitrarily close together.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.