Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The binary between nature and culture cannot be maintaine... — Carmelics
    Home/Environmental Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The binary between nature and culture cannot be maintained and must be replaced with an indivisible nature/culture.

    Environmental EthicsTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Complex factors go into constituting what is to count as nature for us.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The boundaries between human and animal, and between animal and machine, are not naturally fixed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The cyborg—a creature simultaneously animal and machine—captures our bodily reality, showing that no clear boundary separates what is natural from what is constructed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Environmental EthicsTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Environmental Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    3 topics

    Consciousness & Mind2 linkedPersonal Identity2 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Complex factors go into constituting what is to count as nature for us.The boundaries between human and animal, and between animal and machine, are not...The cyborg—a creature simultaneously animal and machine—captures our bodily real...

    Similar

    Nature must be viewed as an active agent and partner in the constituti...73%The genetic method can only establish what humans believe now or in a ...73%Moral naturalism does not presuppose properties of a special or non-na...73%There is an incalculable gulf between the domain of nature as the sens...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: feminist-body
    View source passageHide passage
    This is not to deny that there is something independent of our conceptualizations which sets constraints on what can be said about it. What we cannot do is disentangle the bit which is given from our ways of thinking about it. What needs addressing according to Barad is “the entanglement of matter and meaning” (Barad 2007), the inter-implication of the discursive and the material in which no priority is given to either side. Barad explores this entanglement with particular reference to the work
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit