Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The Buddha nevertheless claims that unenlightened persons... — Carmelics
    Home/Afterlife & Death
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The doctrine of non-self is incompatible with the Buddhist doctrines of karma and rebirth

    The Buddha nevertheless claims that unenlightened persons will be reborn as sentient beings after death

    Afterlife & DeathPersonal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Afterlife & DeathPersonal Identity

    Related

    If no constituent moves from one life to the next, the being in the next life ca...Mental states all originate in dependence on sense-object contact events, so no ...The body ceases to exist at deathThe doctrine of non-self is incompatible with the Buddhist doctrines of karma an...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Afterlife & Death
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    There is rational hope for a form of continued existence after an indi...77%Since persons are not identical with their bodies, it need not be main...77%If there is an afterlife, victims in this life do not have to be etern...75%Baker's constitution view of persons opens the way for a doctrine of r...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: buddha
    View source passageHide passage
    This line of objection to the Buddha’s teaching of non-self is more commonly formulated in response to the argument from impermanence, however. Perhaps its most dramatic form is aimed at the Buddha’s acceptance of the doctrines of karma and rebirth. It is clear that the body ceases to exist at death. And given the Buddha’s argument that mental states all originate in dependence on sense-object contact events, it seems no psychological constituent of the person can transmigrate either. Yet the Bu

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective