Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The c-terms (consequence, valid, contravalid, synonymous)... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Carnap's so-called 'syntactic' method in the Logical Syntax actually includes much of what should properly be called semantics

    The c-terms (consequence, valid, contravalid, synonymous) that Carnap classifies as syntactic are closer to what modern logicians call semantic terms

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Related

    Carnap himself later recognized that his 'syntax' included much of what he would...Carnap's so-called 'syntactic' method in the Logical Syntax actually includes mu...Languages I and II are interpreted languages, not formal languages in the modern...While the syntactic method requires disregarding interpretations, a fixed interp...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Carnap's definition of logical consequence for Language II in the Logi...79%Therefore, to avoid circularity, the characterization of genuine singu...77%Carnap's so-called 'syntactic' method in the Logical Syntax actually i...74%Empty terms are permitted in Bolzano's logic74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: carnap
    View source passageHide passage
    That the main concepts of deductive logic (“e.g., provability, derivability from given premises, logical independence, etc”.) are purely syntactical was argued primarily by showing how they could be defined in two exemplary languages without reference to the meanings of any terms. Language I is a form of primitive recursive arithmetic, and was intended to exemplify a constructivist kind of language, while Language II contains classical mathematics. (In modern terminology, both of these “language

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective