Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The calculus rules allow elimination of ¬φ to infer Γ ⊢ φ — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Strong completeness holds for many-sorted logic: if Γ ⊨ φ then Γ ⊢ φ

    The calculus rules allow elimination of ¬φ to infer Γ ⊢ φ

    Philosophy of LanguageProof of definition segments
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageProof of definition segments

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    By Henkin's theorem, if Γ ∪ {¬φ} has no model then Γ ∪ {¬φ} is contradictoryIf Γ ⊨ φ, then Γ ∪ {¬φ} is not satisfiable and has no modelStrong completeness holds for many-sorted logic: if Γ ⊨ φ then Γ ⊢ φ

    Similar

    If Γ ∪ {¬φ} is contradictory, the calculus rules allow elimination of ...86%Calculus rules permit the elimination of ¬φ from the assumption set to...84%The Gale-Stewart theorem entails that G(φ) is determined.77%Γ ⊢ φ (Γ proves φ)75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-many-sorted
    View source passageHide passage
    , determining validity, or equivalently, testing for satisfiability of given formulas) for many-sorted logic is undecidable. So, we are in the same situation encountered in one-sorted first-order logic. Of course, if a calculus is to be helpful it would never allow erroneous reasonings: it is not going to drive us from true hypotheses to false conclusions. It must be a sound calculus. Further, it is highly desirable that all the consequences of a set \(\Gamma\) of hypotheses could be derived fr

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective