The Cartesian identification of God's perfection with non-deception conflates metaphysical perfection with a specific moral constraint, a conflation Malebranche's occasionalism explicitly rejects by permitting God to act through imperfect general laws that produce error.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Metaphysical perfection(as used in philosophy of God)
The idea that something (usually God) is perfect in terms of its fundamental nature or being, independent of any moral rules.
Non-deception(as used in ethics and epistemology)
The state of not lying or deceiving; telling the truth or being honest.
Perfection (metaphysical)(as used in theology and metaphysics)
In philosophy, the idea that God or some ultimate reality has all possible positive qualities to the highest degree—like infinite knowledge, power, and goodness.
general laws(covering-law model of scientific explanation)
Nomological generalizations (L_1, L_2, …, L_k) that, together with initial conditions, form the explanans of a scientific explanation
moral constraint(in ethics)
A rule or limit that ethics places on what you should do, acting as a restriction on behavior.
occasionalism(Malebranche's metaphysics)
The doctrine that bodies cannot directly cause modifications in minds (or in each other); instead, a causal relation between body and mind obtains only when God intends the mind to undergo a certain modification on the occasion of a certain bodily change.