The 'category error' claim assumes personal selection is purely subjective, but discrimination patterns reveal systematic exclusion based on group membership, not genuine incompatibility.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Category error(as used in logic and philosophy of language): A logical mistake where you apply a rule or concept to something it doesn't actually fit, like using a math formula on a poem.
Discrimination patterns(as used in ethics and social philosophy): Repeated, observable instances where certain groups of people are treated differently or unfairly in similar situations, showing a consistent bias rather than isolated incidents.
Group membership(as used in discussing fairness and justice): Belonging to a category of people based on shared characteristics like race, gender, or religion, rather than on individual actions or qualities.
Subjective(as used in epistemology and philosophy of mind): Relating to personal experience, feelings, or perspective—how things seem or feel to an individual person, which can differ from person to person.

Based on where you are in your exploration