Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The 'causally isolated system' exemption is a methodological assumption within physics, not a metaphysical loophole available to dualists on demand.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
The distinction between 'methodological assumption' and 'metaphysical loophole' itself requires philosophical justification, not mere assertion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If causally isolated systems are legitimate in physics, dualists can consistently argue minds exemplify this category without special pleading.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Both physics and dualism make unprovable foundational claims; calling one 'methodological' and the other 'metaphysical' begs the question.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Physics operationalizes 'causally isolated' only for tractable measurement contexts, not as metaphysical permission for special pleading.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Dualists invoke isolation to exempt minds from physical laws, but physics applies isolation symmetrically to all systems under study.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Methodological assumptions in science are revisable and empirically constrained; metaphysical loopholes are permanent and unfalsifiable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.