Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The character of a demonstrative is a rule that maps contextual qualitative features to referents, making description-independence illusory.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Demonstratives can function without any contextual feature mapping if direct causal-perceptual contact with objects grounds reference directly.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Even if character maps qualitative features to referents, this doesn't render description-independence illusory—it just explains how context grounds reference.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim conflates two issues: how demonstratives work (via context) with whether descriptive content is essential to their meaning (a separate question).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Demonstratives like 'this' succeed in reference by exploiting contextual features (gesture, salience, proximity), not by descriptive content alone.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Two contexts with identical qualitative descriptions can fix different referents via demonstrative use, showing description underdetermines reference.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The character of a demonstrative must be a rule mapping context to referent; otherwise demonstratives lack systematic meaning across uses.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.