Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The charge of paternalism does not refute cosmopolitanism as an ideal but only rejects certain limited instantiations of it
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
When paternalism is structurally entailed by a theory's core commitments, it cannot be dismissed as a mere implementation failure.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Cosmopolitanism's foundational claim that universal reason overrides local self-determination systematically licenses paternalistic intervention.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A theory whose ideal necessarily generates paternalistic structures is itself refuted by the paternalism objection, not merely its applications.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Kant's own cosmopolitan framework in 'Toward Perpetual Peace' required external enforcement mechanisms that presuppose hierarchical authority over sovereign peoples.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The distinction between an ideal and its instantiations collapses when no non-paternalistic instantiation has ever been coherently specified in the literature.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The objections regarding imperialism and paternalism are largely internal to cosmopolitan theory
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
These objections challenge specific implementations of cosmopolitanism rather than the cosmopolitan ideal itself
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.