The claim conflates computational correctness with identity preservation. A function may compute 'correctly' relative to its new inputs while f itself becomes extensionally different.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
extensionally different(The statement is arguing that even if a function works the same way, it might be a genuinely different function in what it is.)
Different in terms of what it actually does or produces, rather than just how it's described or named.