The claim conflates epistemic justification for obligations with causal effectiveness; an obligation can remain epistemically sound even if impartial action sometimes produces better outcomes.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
The respondent's commitment to a specific stance on the case put forward by the opponent, which governs how the respondent must respond to subsequent propositions throughout the disputation.