The claim conflates individual rationality with strategic rationality: a single costly punishment may be rational *ex post* while remaining irrational *ex ante* given uncertainty about future interactions.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
A form of rationality that is end-directed, meaning one acts rationally when doing so serves one's goals or desired outcomes, independent of the truth of the underlying belief
uncertainty about future interactions(in strategic decision-making)
Not knowing for sure what will happen next or how other people will act toward you in the future.