The claim conflates interpretive metaphysics with mathematical formalism; non-separability is a feature of *physical systems*, not proof that probability's domain itself is ill-defined.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Physical systems(what IIT might be applied to beyond human experience)
Any arrangement of matter or energy in the universe—could be a brain, a computer, a rock, or anything else made of physical stuff.
Probability's domain(as used in philosophy of science)
The subject matter or scope of probability theory—what kinds of things probability applies to and how we should understand what probability actually means.
metaphysics(Hartshorne's naturalistic redefinition of metaphysics)
On Hartshorne's view, the study not of realities beyond the physical, but of features of reality that are ubiquitous or that would exist in any possible world.