The claim conflates logical independence from empirical computational differences; intermediate degrees show complexity distinctions, not that T-completeness needs separate foundational justification.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Logical independence(the assumption that individual representations could exist separately from a unified self)
The idea that one thing can exist or be true completely on its own, without needing anything else to explain it or make it work.
T-completeness(as used in computability theory)
A property in mathematical logic where a system can solve certain problems using a different, broader method (Turing reducibility). It's a more general way of measuring completeness than m-completeness.
foundational justification(Foundationalist epistemology; the target of BonJour's regress-style objection)
A form of justification in which a belief is justified independently of other beliefs — its justification does not derive from inferential relations to further justified beliefs.