Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The claim conflates the content of desert-bases with external justifications, ignoring that desert concepts have internal normative structure.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Desert-bases (actions, effort, character) are descriptive facts that require external normative principles to justify any obligation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Claiming internal structure avoids the hard question: why should this internal structure matter morally or practically?
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
All norms ultimately depend on external justification; 'internal structure' merely postpones rather than resolves this problem.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Desert concepts inherently contain built-in evaluative standards (e.g., merit, fairness) that don't require external justification.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Confusing what makes someone deserve X with why society should recognize that desert creates circular reasoning about legitimacy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Internal normative structure explains why desert claims feel binding without appealing to external moral frameworks.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.