The claim itself privileges a distinction between 'consistency' and 'robust existence' without justifying why consistency should be epistemically accessible if existence is wholly separate.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
The syntactic counterpart of satisfiability; corresponds to satisfiability in the same sense as ⊢ corresponds to ⊨
epistemology(Contrasted with purely descriptive scientific inquiry)
A normative enterprise that tells us how we ought to reason from evidence and how we ought to justify our beliefs, as distinct from merely describing how we do reason or justify beliefs