Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The claim therefore fails to establish a genuine category of evil beyond the reach of agent-based moral explanation.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Systemic injustices can persist and cause harm even when no individual agent consciously intends or chooses them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Agent-based explanations often obscure how institutions distribute agency unequally, making some harms structural.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Natural disasters and diseases cause genuine moral harm that no agent explanation can account for or prevent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.All moral wrongs ultimately reduce to choices or omissions by responsible agents accountable for their actions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If evil exists independently of agent behavior, we cannot explain why holding agents responsible is justified.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Structural or systemic harms are best understood as aggregations of individual decisions, not irreducible phenomena.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.