Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The claim therefore misidentifies an explanatory challeng... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Hume must either ground sympathy for public interest in more basic natural sentiments or abandon the claim that all morally good actions have natural, non-moral motives.

    The claim therefore misidentifies an explanatory challenge as a logical dilemma, conflating the genetic origin of a motive with its normative classification.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Origins and justifications operate in different logical spaces: causal history doesn't determine normative status or rational warrant.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Conflating these categories commits a genetic fallacy: a motive's evolutionary source tells us nothing about whether it's ethically valid.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Explanatory challenges require identifying causal mechanisms, while logical dilemmas require showing conceptual contradiction or incoherence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Origins profoundly constrain normative possibilities: a motive with no legitimate source in reason cannot acquire rational justification later.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The distinction between genetic and normative questions presupposes we can treat them independently, but they may be conceptually entangled.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Calling something a mere 'explanatory challenge' may obscure that explaining an origin can itself create genuine normative difficulties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Virtue Ethics1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Calling something a mere 'explanatory challenge' may obscure that explaining an ...Conflating these categories commits a genetic fallacy: a motive's evolutionary s...Explanatory challenges require identifying causal mechanisms, while logical dile...Hume must either ground sympathy for public interest in more basic natural senti...
    +3 moreShow less
    Origins and justifications operate in different logical spaces: causal history d...Origins profoundly constrain normative possibilities: a motive with no legitimat...The distinction between genetic and normative questions presupposes we can treat...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit