Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The composite view in Argument 3 cannot explain why replacing the intentional thought (e.g., changing what one believes caused the loss) systematically transforms the very qualitative feel of the emotion.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Intentional content might alter which bodily patterns occur, not demonstrate that composite views cannot explain the transformation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Composite views can incorporate arousal variation, facial feedback, and neural activity changes triggered by belief revision.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim assumes qualitative feel is non-physical; but if physicalism is true, changing thought-dependent neural states suffices to explain it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Qualitative feel depends on cognitive appraisal; changing belief about causation alters appraisal, thus transforming phenomenal character.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Composite views treat emotion as purely bodily state + thought; this decomposition cannot capture how thoughts constitutively shape qualia.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If two emotions with identical bodily states differ only in intentional content, composite theory lacks resources to explain phenomenal difference.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.