Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The concept of a 'necessary being' whose non-existence is impossible is either analytically vacuous or smuggles existence into essence, as Kant argued in CPR A592/B620.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Some abstract objects (numbers, logical truths) seem necessarily existent without depending on empirical verification, undermining Kant's strict divide.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Distinguishing sharply between essence and existence may itself be a conceptual move that needs justification, not a self-evident principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A necessary being could be coherently conceived as one whose nature entails existence without circularity—just as mathematical truths do.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Existence is not a real predicate but a presupposition of having any predicates at all, so it cannot be part of a concept's essence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If necessity derived from essence alone, we could know a priori whether anything exists, contradicting our dependence on experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The ontological argument illicitly treats 'necessary being' as meaningful content when it merely restates the assumption that existence follows from concept.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.