Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The concept of aesthetic 'truth' adds little to the notio... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The concept of aesthetic 'truth' adds little to the notion of aesthetic correctness and can be dispensed with

    Aesthetics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.We can already account for aesthetic normativity using the notion of correctness
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.We can express the relevant logical constraints — that something cannot be both beautiful and ugly in the same respect at the same time — without invoking the word 'true'
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Truth, unlike mere correctness, carries cognitive significance: it connects aesthetic judgments to the world rather than only to standards of assessment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kant's account of aesthetic judgments as making a demand on universal assent presupposes that something beyond local correctness criteria is at stake.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If aesthetic judgments can be true, they can stand in genuine inferential relations with non-aesthetic truths, enabling aesthetic knowledge—not just aesthetic conformity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Murdoch and McDowell argue that aesthetic perception involves tracking mind-independent features of works, which correctness language alone cannot capture.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A judgment can be correct relative to a practice yet fail to be true if that practice is systematically distorted—truth thus provides a standard that correctness cannot supply.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    AestheticsTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A judgment can be correct relative to a practice yet fail to be true if that pra...If aesthetic judgments can be true, they can stand in genuine inferential relati...Kant's account of aesthetic judgments as making a demand on universal assent pre...Murdoch and McDowell argue that aesthetic perception involves tracking mind-inde...
    +3 moreShow less
    Truth, unlike mere correctness, carries cognitive significance: it connects aest...We can already account for aesthetic normativity using the notion of correctnessWe can express the relevant logical constraints — that something cannot be both ...

    Similar

    We can already account for aesthetic normativity using the notion of c...79%The perfection of the object in aesthetic experience cannot always be ...78%The honorific use of 'aesthetic' is inadequate as the sole meaning of ...78%Even in cases of aesthetic testimony, the aesthetic properties of the ...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: aesthetic-judgment
    View source passageHide passage
    However, although we can cast aesthetic normativity in terms of truth, we need not do so. Aesthetic “truth”, in fact, adds little to the notion of correctness that we have already encountered. We can do without the word “true”. We can say that something cannot both be beautiful and ugly (in the same respect at the same time), and that if something is beautiful then it is not ugly (in the same respect at the same time).[1]
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit