Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The concept of cause requires a synthetic rather than merely analytic connection between ground and consequent.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Hume showed that causal necessity is never observed in events themselves, only in the mind's habitual expectation after repeated conjunction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If causal necessity derives from psychological habit rather than objective connection, the analytic/synthetic distinction does not carve causal cognition at its joints.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A regularity theory of causation requires no synthetic a priori connection—constant conjunction suffices to ground causal claims empirically.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Leibniz held that all truths, including causal ones, are in principle reducible to identities, with apparent contingency reflecting only our epistemic finitude.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If causal relations are grounded in the complete concept of a substance, then 'A causes B' is analytically entailed by the full description of A—making the connection analytic, not synthetic.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The concept of cause involves a real ground, not merely a logical relation between ground and consequent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A real ground requires a synthetic connection, not one derivable by analysis alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.