Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The concept of experience can only be applied in the cont... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→For a series of diverse experiences to belong to a single consciousness, those experiences must be connected so as to constitute a temporally extended experience of a unified objective world.

    The concept of experience can only be applied in the context of applying categories of things which are not experiences.

    Consciousness & MindPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    3 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Perception
    1 linked
    Personal Identity1 linked

    Related

    A self-conscious creature's experiences must provide room for the thought of exp...Categories of non-experiential things can be available to a subject only if its ...For a series of diverse experiences to belong to a single consciousness, those e...Providing grounds for applying categories of non-experiential things requires th...

    Similar

    Reference to experiences is not referentially basic.85%It is not clear that 'experience' cannot be analysed in topic-neutral ...84%Providing grounds for applying categories of non-experiential things r...84%Whether an experience is experienced as mine does not depend on someth...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: strawson
    View source passageHide passage
    With regards to the lower limit of sense and the constructive part of the first Critique, Strawson examines Kant’s argument that our experience must be of recognisably independent objective items, which are spatial and temporal, and which must satisfy some strong principles of permanence and causation. Strawson argues, with both care and brilliance, that Kant’s arguments are defective in various ways, but that somewhat weaker, yet nonetheless important, conclusions along similar lines can be def

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective