Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The concept of freedom must have influence on the domain of nature, despite the two domains being separated by an unbridgeable theoretical gulf.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Causal closure of the physical domain entails that every physical event has a sufficient physical cause, leaving no causal gap for freedom to occupy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If freedom cannot introduce new causal chains into nature without violating physical law, its 'influence' reduces to an epiphenomenal gloss on purely natural processes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Hume's fork establishes that relations between distinct domains can only be known through experience or conceptual analysis, not mere practical postulation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kant's own theoretical philosophy bars synthetic a priori knowledge of how a noumenal freedom could interact with phenomenal nature, making the 'influence' claim unintelligible by his own critical standards.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The concept of freedom imposes ends through its laws.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The ends imposed by the laws of freedom must be realized in the sensible world.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The sensible world belongs to the domain of nature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.