Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The concept of historical origin cannot be reduced to empirical causality or the naked factual existence of what has come into being.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Historical origin is not merely 'the coming-to-be of what has originated'.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Historical origin cannot be recognized in 'the naked, manifest existence of the factual'.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Reducing origin to empirical causality abstracts away from the essential inner history of works and forms.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
2 perspectives
Reason against 1 of 2
?
1.
Aristotle's distinction between efficient causality and formal cause shows that what something *is* cannot be derived from how it was *produced*.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Benjamin's concept of Ursprung designates a vortex in the stream of becoming, recovering suppressed possibilities that mere genetic accounts permanently foreclose.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Hegel's dialectic demonstrates that the truth of a phenomenon emerges through its developmental contradictions, not its contingent point of emergence in time.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason against 2 of 2
?
1.
Husserl's genetic phenomenology establishes that the sedimented meaning of cultural forms exceeds any causal-historical reconstruction of their factual genesis.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A causal account of origin treats contingent antecedents as sufficient explanation, thereby eliminating the normative surplus that makes historical works intelligible as works.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.