Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The conclusion that tropes are not the only bearers of fi... — Carmelics
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The fittingness of different pro-attitudes toward different objects does not show that tropes are not the only bearers of final value

    The conclusion that tropes are not the only bearers of final value only follows if we assume that what we direct our evaluative attitude at is indicative of where value is localized

    AestheticsModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    AestheticsModality & Possibility

    Key Terms

    Bearers of final value(as used in ethics)
    Things that are considered valuable for their own sake, not just because they lead to something else—like pleasure or friendship valued directly, not as a means to an end.
    Evaluative attitude(as used in ethics and epistemology)
    The mental stance you take when you judge something as good, bad, beautiful, or worthwhile.
    Localized(as used in chemistry and physics)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Confined to or existing in a specific, limited place rather than spread out everywhere.
    final value(Used by Olson to argue that the object of an evaluative attitude is not necessarily the locus of final value)
    The value something has for its own sake
    tropes(Cited as examples of non-material entities whose interpenetration supersubstantivalism does not rule out)
    Particular property instances that can be exactly located at regions without being identical to those regions

    Connections

    1 topic

    Virtue Ethics1 linked

    Related

    Final value should be understood strictly as the value something has for its own...If a person is valuable because of her courage, she is not valuable for her own ...The evaluative attitude may be directed at a person or thing, but the person or ...The fittingness of different pro-attitudes toward different objects does not sho...

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: tropes
    View source passageHide passage
    That tropes are the bearers of (final) value is a view held by several trope theorists. To say that what we value are the particular properties of things and persons is prima facie intuitive (Williams 1997 [1953]: 123). And since concrete particulars—but not tropes—are sometimes the subjects of simultaneous yet conflicting evaluations, tropes seem especially suited for the job as (final) value-bearers (Campbell 1997 [1981]: 130–131). That tropes are the only bearers of final value has however be

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective