Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The continual creation of matter in steady-state cosmology is a manifestation of perpetual divine creation.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Steady-state cosmology's C-field, as formulated by Hoyle, is a physical field governed by natural equations, not an ontological gap requiring agency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Invoking divine causation where a complete physical description already exists commits the 'God of the gaps' fallacy identified by Bonhoeffer and Pannenberg.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A perpetual natural process, however unusual, does not logically entail a personal creator without a separate argument that persons are the only productive causes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Hume's Dialogues establish that analogical inference from human creativity to divine creativity fails when the phenomenon lacks clear resemblance to intentional acts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Continual field-driven particle creation is structurally analogous to radioactive decay—a law-governed regularity—not to purposive fabrication from nothing.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Identifying a law-governed regularity with 'perpetual divine activity' conflates Spinoza's natura naturans with the theistic conception of a freely willing creator.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Ex nihilo creation of matter violates the law of energy conservation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A violation of energy conservation requires an external creative cause to account for it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The external creative cause of matter's continual creation is best identified with perpetual divine activity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.