Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The contradiction only arises if 'being' is univocal across God and creatures, but Aquinas explicitly rejects univocity in favor of analogical predication.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Analogical predication is semantically obscure—it's unclear how analogy avoids either univocity or complete equivocation in practice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If 'being' means something entirely different for God versus creatures, then statements like 'God exists' convey no determinate meaning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The analogy solution merely relocates the problem: explaining the relationship between analogates requires justifying shared intelligibility somewhere.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Univocal predication requires identical meanings; God's being differs infinitely from creatures, so univocity is logically incoherent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Analogy preserves both God's transcendence and our ability to speak meaningfully about God without reducing Him to creatures.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Medieval logic shows that contradictions arise only when the same property holds identically in subject and predicate across different beings.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.