Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The contrary of Caesar's crossing the Rubicon — Caesar re... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon was contingent, not necessary

    The contrary of Caesar's crossing the Rubicon — Caesar remaining in Gaul — does not imply a contradiction

    Modality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & Possibility

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    An action is necessary only if its contrary implies a contradiction

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Both crossing the Rubicon and remaining in Gaul could co-exist within some compl...
    Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon was contingent, not necessary

    Similar

    Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon was not necessary, because its contra...94%This yields a contradiction: H+L > H and H > H+L.80%That which involves a contradiction is false80%D1 and D2 together entail that a contradiction follows from the hypoth...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: leibniz-modal
    View source passageHide passage
    Leibniz's account of modality opens the way for him to present a distinctive kind of compatibilist theory of free will. For, according to Leibniz, Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon was a free act insofar as it spontaneously flowed from his own individual nature or was part of his complete concept and insofar as it represented Caesar's choice of what he perceived to be the best option for him at the time. This action was not necessary – and therefore contingent – because its contrary (for example,

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective