Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The correct diagnosis is that one of the two premises in his anti-skeptical argument must be rejected rather than reconciled through compatibilism.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Compatibilism doesn't ignore the premises—it redefines key terms coherently, showing apparent contradiction dissolves under proper analysis.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Rejecting a premise requires justifying which one and why; compatibilism avoids this burden by preserving both premises as true.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Many successful philosophical positions (free will, knowledge) depend on compatibilist moves; dismissing this strategy begs the question.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Compatibilism requires adding hidden assumptions that weren't in the original argument, making it an ad hoc rescue rather than genuine resolution.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
One premise is likely false on independent grounds, so rejecting it is more parsimonious than accepting both and invoking compatibilism.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The argument's premises contradict at face value; compatibilism just masks this rather than genuinely reconciling them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42