Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The Dao's origination of the ten thousand things in Daode... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Dao is necessarily ziran (self-so/spontaneous), possessing a kind of necessity and aseity analogous to being causa sui in the Thomist tradition

    The Dao's origination of the ten thousand things in Daodejing ch. 40 proceeds from wu (non-being), suggesting dependence on a prior privative ground.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Daodejing 40 explicitly states being (you) emerges from non-being (wu), textually supporting a privative ground as generative source.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A privative ground avoids theological problems of creation ex nihilo by positing wu as potentiality rather than absolute nothingness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Wu's generative role explains why the ten thousand things lack inherent essence—they depend on prior negation/emptiness for existence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Chapter 40's 'being from non-being' describes metaphorical process, not ontological priority; wu needn't be a ground but a complementary principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Interpreting wu as 'privative ground' imposes substance-metaphysics onto Daoism, which explicitly rejects hypostatizing even foundational principles.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The Dao itself precedes both wu and you; invoking wu as prior ground subordinates the Dao, contradicting Daodejing's foundational claims.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    A privative ground avoids theological problems of creation ex nihilo by positing...Chapter 40's 'being from non-being' describes metaphorical process, not ontologi...Daodejing 40 explicitly states being (you) emerges from non-being (wu), textuall...Interpreting wu as 'privative ground' imposes substance-metaphysics onto Daoism,...
    +3 moreShow less
    The Dao is necessarily ziran (self-so/spontaneous), possessing a kind of necessi...The Dao itself precedes both wu and you; invoking wu as prior ground subordinate...Wu's generative role explains why the ten thousand things lack inherent essence—...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit