Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The denial of a skeptical scenario ('I am not a BIV') is ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→We are not justified in believing that we are not victims of a skeptical scenario

    The denial of a skeptical scenario ('I am not a BIV') is a Moorean hinge proposition that constitutes the framework within which epistemic evaluation occurs, not a claim subject to that evaluation.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    BIV(Epistemology / skepticism about external world knowledge)
    Brain-in-a-vat — a hypothetical subject whose experiences are artificially induced, used as a skeptical scenario
    Epistemic evaluation(epistemology)
    The process of judging whether a belief or claim counts as knowledge, is reasonable, or is justified—basically, assessing how solid our reasons are for believing something.
    Moorean hinge proposition(epistemology and philosophy of knowledge)
    A statement so fundamental to how we think that we can't seriously question it without undermining everything else—named after philosopher G.E. Moore, who argued some things are just too basic to doubt (like 'I have hands').
    Skeptical scenario(Used to challenge the scope of ordinary perceptual knowledge)
    A possible world in which S is systematically deceived such that it merely appears to S that ordinary perceptual propositions are true, even though they are false

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    framework(Carnap's philosophy of language and logic)
    A structured system of rules or language that must be in place for rational discourse to be possible.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    We are not justified in believing that we are not victims of a skeptical scenari...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective