Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The difference in velocity is not connatural to the mediu... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The medium is not a necessary condition for motion, but only provides resistance

    The difference in velocity is not connatural to the medium itself

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Causation

    Related

    Different velocities of a stone through air versus water are caused only by the ...The medium is not a necessary condition for motion, but only provides resistance

    Similar

    There is neither violence nor resistance among the celestial spheres t...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    76%
    The medium is not a necessary condition for motion, but only provides ...75%
    Different velocities of a stone through air versus water are caused on...74%
    Dependence on medium effects does not entail that what we hear are sou...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ibn-bajja
    View source passageHide passage
    Aristotle rejected the possibility of motion in the void because the medium was essential to natural movement at finite speed (Phys. IV.8). John Philoponus had already expressed the view that the medium is not a necessary condition, but only provides resistance. The different velocities with which the stone passes through the air or the water is only caused by the different density of the medium; it is not connatural to the medium. As a proof that motion without any medium, namely, through a voi

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective