Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The difference principle regulates consumption activities. — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Fair Equality of Opportunity (FEO) should take strict lexical priority over the difference principle (maximizing primary goods holdings of the worst off).

    The difference principle regulates consumption activities.

    ConsequentialismSocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    ConsequentialismSocial Contract

    Connections

    2 topics

    Rights & Liberty3 linkedVirtue Ethics

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    1 linked

    Related

    FEO regulates opportunities for self-realization.Fair Equality of Opportunity (FEO) should take strict lexical priority over the ...Self-realization should take strict lexical priority over mere consumption activ...

    Similar

    Interpersonal distributive principles derive their force from the meta...71%Utilitarianism is justified in ignoring interpersonal distributive pri...70%Fair Equality of Opportunity (FEO) should take strict lexical priority...70%Even weak sufficiency of the harm principle requires supplementation b...69%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: equal-opportunity
    View source passageHide passage
    One argument in support of the Rawlsian priority for FEO assumes that FEO regulates opportunities for self-realization whereas the principle that demands maximization of the social primary goods holdings of the worst off regulates consumption activities. If we add that self-realization should take strict lexical priority over mere consumption activities in anyone's reasonable plan of life, we get an argument for the priority of FEO (Taylor 2004). Another argument starts from the observation that

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective