Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The disjunctivist analysis makes determinable instantiation parasitic on whichever determinate happens to be instantiated, inverting the ontological priority.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Determinables constrain which determinates are possible; this foundational role suggests priority, not parasitism.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Color-determinable is instantiated whenever any determinate is; mutual instantiation suggests parity, not parasitism.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Properties like 'shape' remain constant while determinates (square, circle) vary, suggesting determinables are more fundamental.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Determinates are causally efficacious (red causes effects); determinables like color are causally inert abstractions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
We instantiate determinates directly in reality; determinables exist only as conceptual groupings we impose afterward.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Ontological priority tracks what exists fundamentally. Since determinates exist independently, determinables depend on them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.