The distinction between Evidenz and psychological accompaniment remains unclear in LU and risks reintroducing precisely the kind of unmediatable givenness Husserl elsewhere rejects.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Evidenz(Husserl's concept of how we experience certainty): A German philosophical term meaning a kind of direct, self-confirming experience—when something appears to your mind so clearly that you just *know* it's real without needing proof.
Husserl: Edmund Husserl (1859-1938) was a German philosopher who founded a way of thinking called "phenomenology," which focuses on carefully examining how we experience and perceive the world around us. Rather than assuming things are simply as they appear, Husserl developed methods to deeply explore human consciousness and the structures of our experiences. His work became foundational to modern philosophy and influenced many thinkers who came after him.
LU(as a reference to a philosophical text): Short for Husserl's major work 'Logical Investigations,' a foundational text in phenomenology that explores how we understand meaning and knowledge.
Psychological accompaniment(contrasted with objective self-givenness): A feeling or mental sensation that just tags along with an experience but doesn't tell you anything reliable about what's actually true.

Based on where you are in your exploration