The divergence between CET's polynomial boundary and practical feasibility constitutes a counterexample in the tradition of reflective equilibrium, where theoretical principles must cohere with considered judgments about specific cases.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

CET(as used in philosophy of computation): An abbreviation for a specific philosophical thesis about computation (likely 'Computational Feasibility Thesis' or similar), but the exact meaning would depend on the source text.
Polynomial boundary(as the theoretical limit of CET): A mathematical limit or edge defined by a polynomial equation—essentially, the outer edge of what a mathematical model can handle or describe.
coherence(Applied uniformly by Bosanquet to both religious and non-religious truth claims.): The standard by which truth is assessed — a belief or system of beliefs is true insofar as it forms a consistent, internally unified whole.
considered judgments(Rawlsian moral epistemology): Moral judgments solicited under conditions where people are calm and have adequate information about the cases under consideration, used as inputs to Rawlsian reflective equilibrium

Based on where you are in your exploration