Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The doctrine of divine simplicity requires existence to function as a genuine attribute, which Kantian logic denies it can be.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Kant's distinction between logical and real predicates protects against ontological fallacies by showing existence adds nothing to a concept's content.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Divine simplicity and Kantian logic may be compatible: God's existence can be necessary without being a real attribute, via God's unique metaphysical status.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim conflates 'existence functioning as an attribute' with 'existence being real'; necessity doesn't require treating existence as a genuine property.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Divine simplicity requires God's essence and existence to be identical, making existence constitutive of God's nature, not a contingent addition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Kant's logic treats existence as a logical predicate only, not a real attribute, but this framework cannot accommodate God's necessary self-subsistence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If existence is not a genuine attribute in God, then God's essence could theoretically exist without instantiation, contradicting divine necessity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.