Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The dominance of the ascetic ideal over philosophy explai... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The dominance of the ascetic ideal over philosophy explains why the value of truth has never been treated as a philosophical problem.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The ascetic ideal has been lord over all philosophy up to the present.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Under the ascetic ideal, truth is equated with being, god, and the highest authority.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.When truth is treated as the highest authority itself, questioning its value is not permitted.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Pyrrhonian skeptics systematically suspended judgment on truth's reliability, treating its value as genuinely open rather than presupposed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Academic skeptics like Carneades developed probabilism precisely because they questioned whether truth was attainable or worth pursuing as an ideal.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.These ancient traditions predate and directly contradict the claim that philosophy universally deferred to truth as an unquestioned authority.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.William James and John Dewey explicitly subordinated truth's value to practical consequences, treating 'truth' as instrumentally justified rather than intrinsically sacred.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Pragmatism emerged as a mainstream philosophical movement, not a marginal one, demonstrating that questioning truth's absolute value is a recurring philosophical achievement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    3 topics

    Virtue Ethics1 linkedNatural Theology1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Academic skeptics like Carneades developed probabilism precisely because they qu...Pragmatism emerged as a mainstream philosophical movement, not a marginal one, d...Pyrrhonian skeptics systematically suspended judgment on truth's reliability, tr...The ascetic ideal has been lord over all philosophy up to the present.
    +4 moreShow less
    These ancient traditions predate and directly contradict the claim that philosop...Under the ascetic ideal, truth is equated with being, god, and the highest autho...

    Similar

    This uncritical acceptance of truth derives from the ascetic ideal's d...86%The ascetic ideal has been lord over all philosophy up to the present.85%Once faith in the God of the ascetic ideal is denied, the value of tru...82%Under the ascetic ideal, truth is equated with being, god, and the hig...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: idealism
    View source passageHide passage
    Turn to the most ancient and most modern philosophies: all of them lack a consciousness of the extent to which the will to truth itself needs a justification, here is a gap in every philosophy—where does it come from? Because the ascetic ideal has so far been lord over all philosophy, because truth was set as being, as god, as the highest authority itself, because truth was not allowed to be a problem. Do you understand this “allowed to be”?—From the very moment that faith in the God of the asce
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    When truth is treated as the highest authority itself, questioning its value is ...
    William James and John Dewey explicitly subordinated truth's value to practical ...
    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit