Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The early/late selection debate is based on a false premi... — Carmelics
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The early/late selection debate is based on a false premise and should be rejected

    Consciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The early/late selection debate assumes attentional capacity limitations are clustered into a single bottleneck
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Some theories posit multiple bottlenecks rather than a single one
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Some theories posit capacity limitations distributed throughout the processing stream rather than clustered into bottlenecks at all
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & MindTruth & Knowledge

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Related

    If capacity limitations are not clustered into a single bottleneck, the binary e...Some theories posit capacity limitations distributed throughout the processing s...Some theories posit multiple bottlenecks rather than a single oneThe early/late selection debate assumes attentional capacity limitations are clu...

    Similar

    The early/late selection debate assumes attentional capacity limitatio...77%The skeptical argument has at least one false premise and is therefore...72%Beatty's argument that drift and selection cannot be distinguished nee...72%Fisher and Ford's conclusion that selection was occurring does not log...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: attention
    View source passageHide passage
    Other theories have been proposed that also retain the Broadbentian idea that attentional selectivity is the result of capacity limitations, while retreating further than Lavie from the picture of attention that Broadbent introduced. These theories reject the terms of the debate between early and late selectionists because they reject the idea that the capacity limitations responsible for attention are clustered into a single bottleneck. In some cases this is because the selectivity of attention
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit